WerreduR v2.0 Positioning
Prepared for Flagship Peer-Reviewed AIED Submission

Where Does a Fractal-Seeded
Controller Stand?

A simulation study positioning a 24-byte, estimation-free difficulty controller (LearningGate) against Computerized Adaptive Testing, staircase rules, matched stored-weight twins, and frontier Large Language Models.

Fast Learning Lag
0.421 Logits
vs 0.755 in Standard CAT
Recovery After Jump
10.4 Trials
vs 56.0 in Standard CAT
Decision Latency
0.4 ms
vs 788 ms in Claude API
State Footprint
24 Bytes
0 Persistent VRAM

Live In-Browser LearningGate Servo Demo

Experience the authentic WERR tripod Mandelbrot kernel dynamically adjusting step sizes in your browser.

Simulation Controls

Balanced Horizon (P ≈ 0.50)

Tracking Trajectory Trials: 0

Current Gain: --
Step Size (s): --

Empirical Positioning Matrix

How the 24-byte fractal-seeded controller compares with standard psychometric testing, staircase rules, and frontier AI.

Dimension Standard CAT Fixed Staircase (= Elo) PEST-type Rule LearningGate (Fractal) Frontier LLM (API)
Underlying Model θ ~ N(0,1) Rasch None None None (Estimation-Free) In-Context Heuristic
State Footprint 121-point posterior 1 float 3 floats 24-byte seed + 6 floats Multi-GB VRAM
Decision Latency 0.008 ms (8 μs) < 0.003 ms < 0.002 ms 0.3 - 0.4 ms 67 - 788 ms
Stationary Tracking 0.257 logits (Best) 0.356 logits 0.412 logits 0.419 logits 0.784 logits
Fast Learning Tracking 0.755 logits lag 0.401 logits 0.465 logits 0.421 logits (Strongest) Lagged
Recovery After Jump 56.0 trials 14.8 trials 11.7 trials 10.4 trials (Fastest) Unstable